Full bibliography | SCC-Authors-Cited

Taylor, L. (2015). Designated Inhospitality: The Treatment of Asylum Seekers Who Arrive by Boat in Canada and Australia. McGill Law Journal, 60(2), 333–379. https://doi.org/10.7202/1029211ar

This paper argues that there are distinct parallels between changes to the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act enacted by Bill C-31 (2012), in particular the Designated Foreign National regime (DFN), and Australia’s treatment of asylum seekers who arrive by boat. It is contended that recent Australian history and policy demonstrate the perils of adopting an ideology of control and exclusion toward asylum seekers instead of a politics of hospitality, and that Australia’s present political climate provides a stark and salutary warning to Canada, as it follows a similar path of securitization. The paper first explains what is meant by a politics of hospitality. In Part I, it analyzes Australia’s attitude toward, and its treatment of, asylum seekers, focusing in particular on the period since 1989. It is argued that Australia’s inhospitable stance toward asylum seekers has had discernible negative outcomes that provide important lessons for Canada. Part II provides a brief historical overview of Canadian policy toward asylum seekers, followed by an analysis of the DFN regime with reference to international law. It then argues that the DFN provisions contravene the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The paper concludes by suggesting that Canada is at risk of following Australia’s security-oriented, inhospitable stance toward asylum seekers.

View on www.erudit.org

Pothier, D. (1993). Charter Challenges to Underinclusive Legislation: The Complexities of Sins of Omission. Queen’s Law Journal, 19(1), 261–308.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated by AI based on the content of the source document.

Morantz, G., Rousseau, C., Banerji, A., Martin, C., & Heymann, J. (2013). Resettlement challenges faced by refugee claimant families in Montreal: lack of access to child care. Child & Family Social Work, 18(3), 318–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2206.2012.00848.x

Adult refugee claimants experience several well-documented post-migratory challenges. Little is known about the resettlement process for refugee claimant families with children. This study reports on 75 open-ended, in-depth interviews with refugee claimant families in Montreal about their resettlement challenges and their proposed solutions to them. These interviews were conducted with 33 dyads and triads of children and parents attending a paediatric hospital. Experiences accessing formal and informal child care in Montreal were addressed. Subsequently, a comparative policy analysis was conducted on residency eligibility criteria for child care subsidization. Twenty-eight out of 39 parents (73%) report a lack of informal or formal child care and 15 out of 33 families (39%) propose improving access to formal child care services. They describe a lack of informal child care as a result of reduced social networks, and affordability as a barrier to formal child care services. Refugee claimants are not eligible for subsidized child care in Quebec. A comparative policy analysis within Canada and comparable countries reveals that this situation is not unique to Quebec. However, most provinces and European countries offer child care subsidies to refugee claimants. Refugee claimants should qualify for child care subsidies. Social workers and community organizations should consider their clients' child care needs in designing programmes and services.

View on onlinelibrary.wiley.com

Orton, H. (1990). Section 15, Benefits Programs and Other Benefits at Law: The Interpretation of Section 15 of the Charter since Andrew. Manitoba Law Journal, 19(2), 288–302.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated by AI based on the content of the source document.

Olsen, G. M. (2007). Toward Global Welfare State Convergence?: Family Policy and Health Care in Sweden, Canada and the United States Special Issue on Globalization: Social Justice & Social Welfare. Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 34(2), 143–164.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated by AI based on the content of the source document.

Neve, A., & Russell, T. (2011). Hysteria and Discrimination: Canada’s Harsh Response to Refugees and Migrants Who Arrive by Sea. University of New Brunswick Law Journal, 62, 37.

Sweet, A. S., & Mathews, J. (2008). Proportionality Balancing and Global Constitutionalism. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 47(1), 72–164.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated by AI based on the content of the source document.

Sanschagrin, D. (2022). Le Nationalisme Constitutionnel Au Canada. (1st ed.). Les Presses de l’Université Laval. https://doi.org/10.1515/9782763759449

"Est-il possible d'enrichir le patrimoine lettré de la Nouvelle-France en lui adjoignant des oeuvres de fiction? En amont de cette réflexion théorique commencée par Bernard Andrès (et que prolonge Rêver le Nouveau Monde), il y a les 16 pièces de la présente anthologie. Aussi françaises à l'origine que le corpus de la Nouvelle-France dont elles s'inspirent en partie, elles n'ont pas encore reçu leurs lettres de naturalisation. Or, cette formalité ne doit pas nous empêcher de lire et de (re)découvrir ces oeuvres méconnues, voire oubliées, qui tout au long du xviiie siècle égayèrent les théâtres de Paris en recourant à l'exotisme canadien. Les pièces de théâtre présentes dans cette anthologie permettent de lire sérieusement, peut-être pour la première fois, des oeuvres qui révèlent le foisonnement de l'imaginaire théâtral français du XVIIIe siècle à l'égard de sa lointaine colonie canadienne, alors perçue comme une terre de liberté."-- Fourni par l'éditeur.

Sealy-Harrington, J. (2013). Assessing Analogous Grounds: The Doctrinal and Normative Superiority of a Multi-Variable Approach. Journal of Law & Equality, 10, 37–70.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated by AI based on the content of the source document.

Schabas, W. A. (1991). Le Droit Europeen Des Droits De La Personne Dans La Jurisprudence Canadienne Et Quebecoise: Notes Et Commentaires. Revue Quebecoise de Droit International, 7(2), 198–209.

Desloges, C. (with Sawicki, C.). (2024). Canadian immigration and refugee law: a practitioner’s handbook (Fourth edition.). Emond Montgomery Publications Limited.

"This title is the fourth edition of our flagship professional immigration title, originally adapted from Lynn Fournier-Ruggles’ Canadian Immigration and Refugee Law for Legal Professionals, 3rd Edition. Aimed at young lawyers and consultants, it offers a broad and practical treatment of Canadian immigration, refugee, and citizenship law."-- Provided by publisher.

Romanow, R. J. (with Whyte, J. D., Leeson, H. A., Whyte, J. D., & Leeson, H. A.). (1984). Canada-- notwithstanding: the making of the Constitution, 1976-1982. Carswell/Methuen.

Salvino, C. (2024). R v Sharma’s’ Clarification’of the Section 15 Framework and its Creation of Unique Barriers for Disability-Based Equality Claims. Constitutional Forum, 32(4), 1. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4806255

View on papers.ssrn.com

Rahimian, T. (2020). Parental Undocumented Status as an Analogous Ground of Discrimination. Journal of Law & Equality, 16, 93–133.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated by AI based on the content of the source document.

Hiebert, J. L. (2023). Compromise and the Notwithstanding Clause: Why the Dominant Narrative Distorts Our Understanding. In Contested Constitutionalism: Reflections on the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. (pp. 107–125). University of British Columbia Press. https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.59962/9780774816762-007/html

6 Compromise and the Notwithstanding Clause: Why the Dominant Narrative Distorts Our Understanding was published in Contested Constitutionalism on page 107.

View on www.degruyterbrill.com

Hiebert, J. (1990). The Evolution of the Limitation Clause. Osgoode Hall Law Journal, 28(1), 103–134.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated by AI based on the content of the source document.

Hiebert, J. L. (1996). Limiting rights: the dilemma of judicial review. University of Toronto Press.

Guénette, D. (with Mathieu, F.). (2023). Constitutionalism v diversity: essays on federal democracy. Peter Lang.

Grimm, D. (2007). Proportionality in Canadian and German Constitutional Jurisprudence Education, Administration, and Justice: Essays in Honour of Frank Iacobucci - IV. Public Law. University of Toronto Law Journal, 57(2), 383–398.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated by AI based on the content of the source document.

Grammond, S. (2016). Louis LeBel et la société distincte. Les Cahiers de droit, 57(2), 251–267. https://doi.org/10.7202/1036484ar

During Justice Louis LeBel’s fifteen-year tenure at the Supreme Court of Canada, Québec’s distinct character was taken into account in several decisions, for example in cases involving the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms or language rights. Although Québec was not always victorious, the Supreme Court still recognized the legitimacy of Québec’s language policy and, as a result, gave Québec more control over admissions to English-language schools than is evident at first sight. However, the most significant recognition of Québec’s specificity is found in cases connected with the constitutional amending formula. In some of its key decisions, the Supreme Court adopted a “contractual” vision of the origins of Canada’s constitution and interpreted it in a way explicitly intended to provide protection for the interests of the provinces, including Québec’s specific interests.

View on www.erudit.org

Search

Full bibliography 2,646 resources

Explore

Resource type

Topics

Publication year