Search
Full bibliography 1,250 resources
-
Disclaimer: This summary was generated by AI based on the content of the source document.
-
Disclaimer: This summary was generated by AI based on the content of the source document.
-
"Indigenous traditions can be uplifting, positive, and liberating forces when they are connected to living systems of thought and practice. Problems arise when they are treated as timeless models of unchanging truth that require unwavering deference and unquestioning obedience. Freedom and Indigenous Constitutionalism celebrates the emancipatory potential of Indigenous traditions, considers their value as the basis for good laws and good lives, and critiques the failure of Canadian constitutional traditions to recognize their significance."-- Provided by publisher., "Demonstrating how Canada's constitutional structures marginalize Indigenous peoples' ability to exercise power in the real world, John Borrows uses Ojibwe law, stories, and principles to suggest alternative ways in which Indigenous peoples can work to enhance freedom. Among the stimulating issues he approaches are the democratic potential of civil disobedience, the hazards of applying originalism rather than living tree jurisprudence in the interpretation of Aboriginal and treaty rights, American legislative actions that could also animate Indigenous self-determination in Canada, and the opportunity for Indigenous governmental action to address violence against women."-- Provided by publisher.
-
The regulation of Native identity has been central to the colonization process in both Canada and the United States. Systems of classification and control enable settler governments to define who is “Indian,” and control access to Native land. These regulatory systems have forcibly supplanted traditional Indigenous ways of identifying the self in relation to land and community, functioning discursively to naturalize colonial worldviews. Decolonization, then, must involve deconstructing and reshaping how we understand Indigenous identity.
-
Disclaimer: This summary was generated by AI based on the content of the source document.
-
By: Jennifer Koshan and Jonnette Watson Hamilton PDF Version: Tugging at the Strands: Adverse Effects Discrimination and the Supreme Court Decision in Fraser Case Commented On: Fraser v Canada (Att…
-
Disclaimer: This summary was generated by AI based on the content of the source document.
-
The equality rights guarantee contained in section 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms has been described by members of the Supreme Court of Canada as “the most difficult right” and “the Charter’s most conceptually difficult provision.” Therefore, it is not surprising that, as Mr. Justice LeBel stated in Québec v A., “the analytical framework [of s. 15] developed by this Court has been discussed, reformulated and enriched many times over the last two decades”. Mr. Justice Cory stated in Vriend that the equality rights guarantee in the Charter embodies “our fondest dreams, the highest hopes and the finest aspirations of Canadian society.” In this paper, I will look back at the last decade of Supreme Court of Canada case law and review how it has been reformulated. I will then look forward and make some comments about where the Court should go with its equality jurisprudence in the next decade if it is to help us realize the “finest dreams of Canadian society.”
-
Disclaimer: This summary was generated by AI based on the content of the source document.
Explore
Resource type
- Blog Post (3)
- Book (483)
- Book Section (106)
- Case (137)
- Conference Paper (3)
- Dictionary Entry (53)
- Encyclopedia Article (1)
- Journal Article (450)
- Newspaper Article (1)
- Preprint (1)
- Presentation (1)
- Report (10)
- Thesis (1)
Topics
- Aboriginal law (3)
- Aboriginal peoples (1)
- Access to information (1)
- Administrative law (10)
- Admissibility (1)
- Appeals (5)
- Arrest (2)
- Assurance (1)
- Bankruptcy and insolvency (3)
- Banks (1)
- Canada (3)
- Charge to jury (2)
- Charter of Rights (13)
- Child and family services (1)
- Choice of forum (1)
- Civil liability (1)
- Communications law (1)
- Constitutional law (26)
- Contracts (1)
- Copyright (7)
- Copyright Pentalogy (5)
- Court having jurisdiction (1)
- Courts (6)
- Criminal law (60)
- Custody (1)
- Division of powers (4)
- Equity (1)
- Evidence (14)
- Expropriation (1)
- Extraterritoriality (1)
- Family law (2)
- Financial institutions (1)
- Fitness to stand trial (1)
- Habeas corpus (1)
- Immigration (3)
- Impaired driving (2)
- Income tax (1)
- Informer privilege (1)
- Infringement (2)
- Insurance (1)
- Intellectual property (5)
- Judicial review (5)
- Jurisdiction (3)
- Obligation of loyalty (1)
- Occupational health and safety (1)
- Open court principle (1)
- Prerogative writs (1)
- Prescription (1)
- Private international law (1)
- Property (1)
- Provincial offences (1)
- Publication bans (1)
- Real property (1)
- Right to security of person (1)
- Sale of goods (1)
- Securities (2)
- Sentencing (8)
- Sex workers (1)
- Sexual assault (4)
- Status of persons (1)
- Statutes (1)
- Taxation (3)
- Telecommunications (1)
- Trafficking in persons (1)
- Transportation law (1)
- Treaty rights (1)
- Trial (2)
- Voyeurism (1)
- Young persons (2)
Publication year
- Between 1700 and 1799 (2)
-
Between 1800 and 1899
(5)
-
Between 1830 and 1839
(1)
- 1830 (1)
-
Between 1840 and 1849
(1)
- 1849 (1)
-
Between 1880 and 1889
(1)
- 1880 (1)
- Between 1890 and 1899 (2)
-
Between 1830 and 1839
(1)
-
Between 1900 and 1999
(257)
-
Between 1910 and 1919
(1)
- 1918 (1)
- Between 1930 and 1939 (6)
- Between 1940 and 1949 (3)
- Between 1950 and 1959 (7)
- Between 1960 and 1969 (24)
- Between 1970 and 1979 (23)
- Between 1980 and 1989 (74)
- Between 1990 and 1999 (119)
-
Between 1910 and 1919
(1)
-
Between 2000 and 2026
(986)
- Between 2000 and 2009 (212)
- Between 2010 and 2019 (338)
- Between 2020 and 2026 (436)