Search

Full bibliography 2,167 resources

1
...
6
7
8
9
10
...
109

Page 8 of 109

Abstracts

Paton-Simpson, E. (2000). Privacy and the Reasonable Paranoid: The Protection of Privacy in Public Places. The University of Toronto Law Journal, 50(3), 305–346. https://doi.org/10.2307/825907

View on www.jstor.org
Hughes, K. (2012). A Behavioural Understanding of Privacy and its Implications for Privacy Law. The Modern Law Review, 75(5), 806–836. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2012.00925.x

This article draws upon social interaction theory (the work of Irwin Altman) to develop a theory of the right to privacy, which reflects the way that privacy is experienced. This theory states that the right to privacy is a right to respect for barriers, and that an invasion of privacy occurs when a privacy barrier is penetrated. The first part of the paper establishes the position of the author's theory in the existing scholarship. The second part of the paper expands upon the theory to explain the nature of privacy barriers and the way that the author's theory manages a number of specific privacy issues, including threats to privacy, attempted invasions of privacy, unforeseeable interferences with privacy and waiving the right to privacy. The final part of the paper demonstrates the impact that this approach to privacy could have upon judicial reasoning, in particular Article 8 European Convention on Human Rights.

View on onlinelibrary.wiley.com
McLachlin, B. (2003). Courts, transparency and public confidence-to the better administration of justice [Edited version of the 2003 Deakin Law School Oration, delivered on 16 Apr 2003.]. Deakin Law Review, 8(1), 1–11.
Solove, D. J. (2002). Conceptualizing Privacy. California Law Review, 90(4), 1087–1156. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/calr90&i=1101

Disclaimer: This summary was generated by AI based on the content of the source document.

View on heinonline.org
Perell, P. M. (with Morden, J. W.). (2020). The law of civil procedure in Ontario (1st ed., 2nd ed., 3rd ed., 4th ed.,). LexisNexis.
Matheson, D. (2009). Dignity and Selective Self‑Presentation. In I. Kerr, V. M. Steeves, & C. Lucock (Eds.), Lessons from the identity trail: anonymity, privacy and identity in a networked society (p. 319). Oxford University Press.

"During the past decade, rapid developments in information and communications technology have transformed key social, commercial, and political realities. Within that same time period, working at something less than Internet speed, much of the academic and policy debate arising from these new and emerging technologies has been fragmented. There have been few examples of interdisciplinary dialogue about the importance and impact of anonymity and privacy in a networked society. Lessons from the Identity Trail: Anonymity, Privacy and Identity in a Networked Society fills that gap, and examines key questions about anonymity, privacy, and identity in an environment that increasingly automates the collection of personal information and relies upon surveillance to promote private and public sector goals." "This book has been informed by the results of a multi-million dollar research project that has brought together a distinguished array of philosophers, ethicists, feminists, cognitive scientists, lawyers, cryptographers, engineers, policy analysts, government policy makers, and privacy experts. Working collaboratively over a four-year period and participating in an iterative process designed to maximize the potential for interdisciplinary discussion and feedback through a series of workshops and peer review, the authors have integrated crucial public policy themes with the most recent research outcomes."--BOOK JACKET.
Eltis, K. (2010). The Judicial System in the Digital Age: Revisiting the Relationship between Privacy and Accessibility in the Cyber Context. McGill Law Journal, 56(2), 289–316.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated by AI based on the content of the source document.
Eltis, K. (2016). Courts, litigants, and the digital age: law, ethics, and practice (Second edition.). Irwin Law.

Courts, Litigants, and the Digital Age examines the ramifications of technology for courts, judges, and the administration of justice. It sets out the issues raised by technology, and, particularly, the Internet, so that conventional paradigms can be updated in the judicial context. In particular, the book dwells on issues such as proper judicial use of Internet sources, judicial ethics and social networking, electronic court records and anonymization techniques, control of the courtroom and jurors' use of new technologies, asnwell as the Internet's impact on judicial appointments and the diversity of thenjudiciary. The second edition includes discussion of current issues in thisnrapidly developing area, such as privacy protection, the "right to be forgotten," cyber intimidation, freedom of digital speech, and litigant anonymity. Through examination of relevant practical, legal, and ethical issues, it endeavours to extract lessons from the developing issues surveyed and proposes forward-thinking approaches based on proportionality principles.
Cockfield, A. J. (2007). Protecting the Social Value of Privacy in the Context of State Investigations Using New Technologies. U.B.C. Law Review, 40(1), 41–68.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated by AI based on the content of the source document.
Austin, L. M. (2019). Re-Reading Westin The Problem of Theorizing Privacy. Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 20(1), 53–82.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated by AI based on the content of the source document.
Ardia, D. S. (2017). Privacy and Court Records: Online Access and the Loss of Practical Obscurity. University of Illinois Law Review, 2017(4), 1385–1454.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated by AI based on the content of the source document.
Sherman Estate v. Donovan - 2021 SCC 25 (June 11, 2021). https://decisions.scc-csc.ca/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/18914/index.do

View on decisions.scc-csc.ca
Heinz, J. (1993). Peremptoary Challenges in Criminal Cases: A Comparison of Regulation in the United States, England, and Canada Notes and Comments. Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Journal, 16(1), 201–244. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/loyint16&i=211

Disclaimer: This summary was generated by AI based on the content of the source document.

View on heinonline.org
Gobert, J. J. (1989). The Peremptory Challenge — an Obituary. Criminal Law Review, 528.
Kettles, B. (2012). Impartiality, Representativeness and Jury Selection in Canada. Criminal Law Quarterly, 59(4), 462–486. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/clwqrty59&i=478

Disclaimer: This summary was generated by AI based on the content of the source document.

View on heinonline.org
Langbein, J. H. (1993). The Historical Origins of the Privilege against Self-Incrimination at Common Law Essay. Michigan Law Review, 92(5), 1047–1085.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated by AI based on the content of the source document.
Tanovich, D. (2008). The Charter of Whiteness: Twenty-Five Years of Maintaining Racial Injustice in the Canadian Criminal Justice System. Supreme Court Law Review, 2d, 40(1). https://doi.org/10.60082/2563-8505.1128

View on digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca
MacDonnell, V. (2017). The Right to a Representative Jury: Beyond Kokopenace. Criminal Law Quarterly, 64(3–4), 334–358. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/clwqrty64&i=348

Disclaimer: This summary was generated by AI based on the content of the source document.

View on heinonline.org
Law Reform Commission of British Columbia (with Aikins, J. S.). (1983). Report on peremptory challenges in civil jury trials. The Commission.
Lederman, W. R. (1985). Democratic Parliaments, Independent Courts, and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Queen’s Law Journal, 11(1), 1–25. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/queen11&i=7

Disclaimer: This summary was generated by AI based on the content of the source document.

View on heinonline.org

1
...
6
7
8
9
10
...
109

Page 8 of 109

Last update from database: 3/25/26, 12:00 AM (UTC)