Results | SCC-Authors-Cited

Smith, J. C. (1968). The Limits of Tort Liability in Canada: Remoteness, Foreseeability and Proximate Cause. In A. M. Linden & C. A. Wright (Eds.), Studies in Canadian tort law (p. 88). Butterworths.

Botterell, A. (2020). Remoteness. In E. Chamberlain & S. G. A. Pitel (Eds.), Fridman’s The Law of Torts in Canada. (4th ed., p. 529). Thomson Reuters.

Botterell, A. (2020). Factual Causation. In E. Chamberlain & S. G. A. Pitel (Eds.), Fridman’s The Law of Torts in Canada. (4th ed., p. 503). Thomson Reuters.

Sinclair, M. (1994). Aboriginal Peoples, Justice and the Law. In R. Gosse, J. Y. Henderson, & R. Carter (Eds.), Continuing Poundmaker and Riel’s quest: presentations made at a conference on Aboriginal peoples and justice (p. 173). Purich Publishing.

Sprott, J. B., Webster, C. M., & Doob, A. N. (2024). Criminal Justice Reform and the Mass Imprisonment of Indigenous People in Canada. In K. M. Campbell & S. Wellman (Eds.), Justice, indigenous peoples, and Canada: a history of courage and resilience (p. 177). Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

"Justice, Indigenous Peoples, and Canada: A History of Courage and Resilience brings together the work of a number of leading researchers to provide a broad overview of criminal justice issues that Indigenous people in Canada have faced historically and continue to face today. Both Indigenous and Canadian scholars situate current issues of justice for Indigenous peoples, broadly defined, within the context of historical realities and ongoing developments. By examining how justice is defined, both from within Indigenous communities and outside of them, this volume examines the force of Constitutional reform and subsequent case law on Indigenous rights historically and in contemporary contexts. It then expands the discussion to include theoretical considerations, particularly settler-colonialism, that help explain how ongoing oppressive and assimilationist agendas continue to affect how so-called "justice" is administered. From a critical perspective, the book examines the operation of the criminal justice system, though bail, specialized courts, policing, sentencing, incarceration, and release. It explores legal frameworks as well as current issues that have significantly affected Indigenous peoples, such as the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, the Inquiry into Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls, human rights, resurgence and identity. This unique collection of perspectives exposes the disconcerting agenda of historical and modern-day Canadian federal government policy and the continued denial of Indigenous rights to self-determination. It is essential reading for those interested in the struggles of the Indigenous peoples in Canada as well as anyone studying race, crime and justice"-- Provided by publisher.

Schneider, R. D. (2020). Sentencing Mentally Disordered Offenders. In D. Cole & J. Roberts (Eds.), Sentencing in Canada: essays in law, policy, and practice (p. 273). Irwin Law Inc.

"Sentencing in Canada contains a unique collection of essays that explore all key aspects of sentencing. The contributors include leading academics, criminal law practitioners, and members of the judiciary, and many of the authors have extensive experience working in the areas of sentencing and parole. The volume is not simply a statement of the law -- instead, the chapters explore the wider context in which sentencing and parole decisions are taken. The volume also incorporates findings from the latest empirical research into sentencing policy and practice in Canada, including important issues such as sentencing Indigenous persons. As Mr Justice Moldaver notes in his preface, the volume "will be useful to criminal law practitioners and, more generally, to all persons interested in sentencing."-- Provided by publisher.

Gunn, B. L. (2019). Bringing a Gendered Lens to Implementing the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. In J. Borrows (Ed.), Braiding legal orders: implementing the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (p. 55). Centre for International Governance Innovation. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.11955033

"Implementation in Canada of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) is a pivotal opportunity to explore the relationship between international law, Indigenous peoples' own laws and Canada's constitutional narratives. Two significant statements by the current Liberal government (the May 2016 address by Indigenous Affairs Minister Carolyn Bennett to the Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues at the United Nations and the September 2017 address to the United Nations by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau) have endorsed UNDRIP and committed Canada to implementing it as 'a way forward' on the path to genuine nation-to-nation relationships with Indigenous peoples. In response, these essays engage with the legal, historical, political and practical aspects of UNDRIP implementation. Written by Indigenous legal scholars and policy leaders, and guided by the metaphor of braiding international, domestic and Indigenous laws into a strong, unified whole composed of distinct parts, the book makes visible the possibilities for reconciliation from different angles and under different lenses"-- Provided by the publisher.

Pelletier, R., & Nerland, K. (2019). Indian status and the crisis of missing and murdered women. In T. Isaac (Ed.), Key developments in Aboriginal law (2019 edition., p. 13). Thomson Reuters.

"The objective of this book is to provide commentary from leading practitioners and thought-leaders on timely and important issues in the area of Aboriginal law in Canada"--Preface, page iii.

Dyzenhaus, D. (1997). The Politics of Deference: Judicial Review and Democracy. In M. Taggart (Ed.), The province of administrative law (p. 279). Hart Publishing.

Dyzenhaus, D. (2006). Disobeying Parliament? Privative Clauses and the Rule of Law. In R. W. Bauman & T. Kahana (Eds.), The least examined branch the role of legislatures in the constitutional state (p. 499). Cambridge University Press.

Lafontaine, L. H. (1856). Opinion. In Lower Canada reports = Décisions des tribunaux du Bas-Canada. Seigniorial questions, a compilation containing the Seignorial Act of 1854, the amendment to the Seignorial Act of 1854, the questions submitted by the Attorney General for Lower Canada, the counter-questions submitted by divers Seigniors, the proceedings and decisions of the Special Court constituted under the authority of the Seigniorial Act of 1854, the pleadings and memoirs of the advocates, and the observations of the judges, &c., &c.: A (p. 1A). A. Coté ; Duvernay Bros. https://bac-lac.on.worldcat.org/oclc/77395041

View on bac-lac.on.worldcat.org

Lanoix, S. (2022). La navigabilité d’un cours d’eau: ses implications dans l’application de la réglementation municipale. In Développements récents en droit municipal (Vol. 509, p. 23). Éditions Yvon Blais.

Le présent ouvrage rassemble les textes des conférences prononcées lors du colloque intitulé "Développements récents en droit municipal", qui s'est tenu à Montréal, le 24 mars 2023. -- Quatrième de couverture

Torres-Ceyte, J. (2025). Livre cinquième — Des obligations. In B. Moore (Ed.), Code civil du Québec: annotations, commentaires, 2025-2026 (10e édition, p. 881). Éditions Yvon Blais.

Beaulieu, B. (2006). La genèse de la délimitation des domaines en milieu hydrique. In S. Normand (Ed.), Mélanges offerts au professeur François Frenette : études portant sur le droit patrimonial (p. 195). Presses de l’Université Laval. https://www.canlii.org/fr/doctrine/doc/2006CanLIIDocs203#!fragment/zoupio-_Tocpdf_bk_0_17_2/BQCwhgziBcwMYgK4DsDWszIQewE4BUBTADwBdoAvbRABwEtsBaAfX2zhoBMAzZgI1TMADMwCMAdmYAmAJQAaZNlKEIARUSFcAT2gByXXIiEwuBOs079h46ZABlPKQBCOgEoBRADLuAagEEAOQBhdzlSMD5oUnYZGSA

Sylvio Normand, 2006 CanLIIDocs 203

View on www.canlii.org

Gerald, D. (2001). Patents Relating to Methods of Medical Treatment. In H. C. Hansen (Ed.), International Intellectual Property Law & Policy (pp. 12–1). Juris Publishing.

Gauvreau, J. (2017). Évolution des critères de brevetabilité et de validité de 2015 à 2017: fin d’une décennie marquée par la multiplication des interprétations, et autres sujets. In Service de la formation continue du Barreau du Québec (Ed.), Développements récents en droit de la propriété intellectuelle (Vol. 437, p. 129). Yvon Blais.

Derényi, E. F. (2010). Patents. In S. C. McCormack (Ed.), Intellectual property law of Canada (2nd ed., p. 307). Juris Pub.

Piper, T. (2010). A Common Law Prescription for a Medical Malaise. In C. W.-M. Ng, L. Bently, & G. D’Agostino (Eds.), The common law of intellectual property: essays in honour of Professor David Vaver (p. 143). Hart Publishing.

Bourassa Forcier, M., & Morin, J.-F. (2008). Canadian pharmaceutical patent policy: international constraints and domestic priorities. In Y. Gendreau (Ed.), An emerging intellectual property paradigm: perspectives from Canada (p. 81). Edward Elgar.

McLachlin, B. (2019). The Role of the Supreme Court of Canada in Shaping the Common Law. In Apex Courts and the Common Law (pp. 25–35). University of Toronto Press. https://doi.org/10.3138/9781487504434.003

View on utppublishing.com