Your search
Results 1,732 resources
-
An article from Les Cahiers de droit, on Érudit.
-
La 4e de couverture indique : "Les institutions judiciaires d'un pays constituent la trame sur laquelle la science du droit s'affine jour après jour à la lumière du contentieux qui afflue vers nos tribunaux. Leur étude est d'actualité. La justice française traverse en effet une période de turbulences qui bouleverse le paysage habituel et polarise l'attention sur d'importantes métamorphoses réalisées, préparées ou simplement annoncées. Dans la mesure où les institutions judiciaires sont une des composantes essentielles de notre vie économique, politique et sociale, il est normal que des réformes leur permettent de mieux répondre aux exigences du monde moderne, notamment celles découlant de l'essor des techniques numériques et du développement de l'intelligence artificielle. Mais ces réformes transforment le service public de la justice, lequel est désormais soumis à des impératifs de gestion et aux principes du management sur le modèle entrepreneurial. C'est un fait que nous sommes confrontés actuellement à une effervescence législative qui, si l'on n'y prend garde, peut devenir une source d'incertitude difficile à maîtriser. Pour remplir correctement son office, la justice a aussi besoin de sérénité. La présente édition est à jour des réformes les plus récentes, notamment la loi du 23 mars 2019 et ses décrets d'application. Cet ouvrage s'adresse d'abord aux étudiants de 1re année voulant approfondir leurs connaissances en institutions juridictionnelles et introduction au droit. Les étudiants de 3e année ou de master pourront y trouver des éléments complétant utilement leur cours de procédure (civile, pénale ou administrative). Ceux préparant les concours et examens d'accès aux professions de la justice (avocats, magistrats, greffiers, huissiers) y puiseront de la matière pour parfaire leur culture judiciaire."
-
A major reform of civil procedure began in 2002 in the wake of the Ferland report, itself inspired by Lord Woolf’s report on civil justice in England and Wales. In both reports, the idea of proportionality is central, but the Civil Procedure Rules, which also address the issue of litigation costs, codified it much more vigorously than legislation adopted here. Local impact studies are also less probative than those conducted in England. Yet the overall assessment of these reforms leads to similar conclusions and ought to persuade the Quebec legislature to carry matters further in order to counteract the effects of a pervasive adversarial culture. To this end, closer case management, a tighter control on oral discovery and the use whenever possible of single, court-appointed or party-designated experts, are all desirable. Seen from this angle, the reform of 2002 in Quebec lags behind the reform based on the Woolf report.
-
This paper proposes a fundamental reshaping of the law regarding presumptions of legislative intent in statutory interpretation. Looking to substantive presumptions in particular, it reviews the jurisprudence and concludes that greater consistency would be desirable and that tensions should be resolved between the traditional approach to substantive presumptions and the modern approach to statutory interpretation consistently adopted by the Supreme Court of Canada. Our proposal seeks to provide a uniform methodology for the use of substantive presumptions by incorporating them into the contextual analysis mandated by the modern approach set out in Re Rizzo & Rizzo Shoes Ltd, [1998] 1 SCR 27, 154 DLR (4th) 193. Rejecting the language of “presumptions” and rules of “strict” or “liberal” construction, it argues in favour of interpretation that relies on a transparent discussion of all relevant sources of statutory meaning (including textual and contextual sources, such as the values underlying substantive presumptions) and against a reflexive or mechanical application of substantive presumptions.
-
An article from McGill Law Journal / Revue de droit de McGill, on Érudit.
-
Family law is evolving towards non-adversarial dispute resolution processes. As a result, some family lawyers are representing clients who are trying to reach settlements that recognize their interests, instead of just pursuing their legal rights. By responding to the full spectrum of client needs, lawyers are required to behave differently than they do when they are representing a client in a traditional civil litigation file. They consider the emotional and financial consequences of relationship breakdown – things that are not typically within the purview of the family law lawyer. They objectively reality check with their clients, and they approach interest-based negotiations in a client-centric way. These lawyers view their role as that of a non-adversarial advocate, and their clients as whole people with interests that are not just legal. This paper draws on an empirical study involving focus groups with family law lawyers, to argue that the Federation of Law Societies of Canada’sModel Code of Professional Conductneeds to be updated to incorporate non-adversarial advocacy. The lawyers in the study viewed non-adversarial advocacy as being responsive to client needs, and in the interest of clients’ children. This paper draws from the study to establish what constitutes non-adversarial advocacy and then it presents a proposal for revising Rule 5 (Advocacy) of the Model Code.
Explore
Resource type
- Blog Post (6)
- Book (555)
- Book Section (176)
- Case (226)
- Conference Paper (3)
- Dictionary Entry (66)
- Document (2)
- Encyclopedia Article (1)
- Journal Article (678)
- Magazine Article (2)
- Newspaper Article (2)
- Preprint (2)
- Presentation (1)
- Report (11)
- Web Page (1)
Topics
- Aboriginal law (4)
- Aboriginal peoples (2)
- Abuse of process (5)
- Access to information (1)
- Administrative law (11)
- Admissibility (1)
- Appeals (5)
- Arrest (2)
- Assurance (1)
- Bankruptcy and insolvency (6)
- Banks (1)
- Canada (2)
- Charge to jury (2)
- Charter of Rights (29)
- Child and family services (1)
- Choice of forum (1)
- Civil liability (1)
- Civil procedure (2)
- Communications law (1)
- Constitutional law (46)
- Contracts (2)
- Copyright (8)
- Copyright Pentalogy (5)
- Costs (1)
- Court having jurisdiction (1)
- Courts (8)
- Criminal law (85)
- Crown law (1)
- Custody (4)
- Declaration of invalidity (1)
- Discoverability (1)
- Division of powers (4)
- Evidence (15)
- Expropriation (2)
- Extraterritoriality (1)
- Family law (7)
- Fiduciary duty (1)
- Financial institutions (1)
- Fitness to stand trial (1)
- Habeas corpus (1)
- Human rights (1)
- Immigration (3)
- Impaired driving (2)
- Income tax (4)
- Informer privilege (1)
- Infringement (2)
- Insurance (2)
- Intellectual property (8)
- Judicial review (5)
- Jurisdiction (5)
- Labour relations (1)
- Limitation of actions (1)
- Mediation (1)
- Negligence (1)
- Obligation of loyalty (1)
- Obstructing justice (1)
- Occupational health and safety (1)
- Open court principle (1)
- Patents (1)
- Prerogative writs (1)
- Prescription (1)
- Private international law (2)
- Property (1)
- Prosecutorial immunity (1)
- Provincial offences (1)
- Publication bans (1)
- Real property (1)
- Right to security of person (1)
- Sale of goods (1)
- Securities (2)
- Sentencing (9)
- Sex workers (1)
- Sexual assault (6)
- Status of persons (1)
- Statutes (1)
- Taxation (6)
- Telecommunications (1)
- Torts (1)
- Trafficking in persons (1)
- Transportation law (2)
- Treaty rights (1)
- Trial (5)
- Voyeurism (1)
- Young persons (2)
Publication year
-
Between 2000 and 2026
- Between 2000 and 2009 (398)
- Between 2010 and 2019 (680)
- Between 2020 and 2026 (654)