Your search
Results 160 resources
-
This study deals with the legal protection of authors' moral rights in Canada. In the first part, the article highlights the beginnings of these rights in Europe and in Canada. The second part analyses the legislative provisions which formally recognize moral rights in the Copyright Act, as well as other legal rules which indirectly protect the intellectual bound between an author and his or her work. The article concludes with an analysis of the legislative jurisdiction over moral rights and the constitutional problems created by the overlap of federal and provincial rules on this matter.
-
In recent years, property theorists have offered varying accounts as to what exactly ownership is, typically focusing on one or more key rights to the owned thing. However, most of these theories are articulated in the abstract and do not engage the jurisprudence. This article uses the jurisprudence concerning expropriation and adverse possession to show that Canadian courts have in fact developed their own definition of ownership-one that is not reflected in the property theory discourse. The author goes on to argue that this narrower definition of ownership-made up by the rights to exclude and to primary use-is preferable to those offered by the property theorists, as it better balances the competing interests of owners, non-owners and the state.
-
This article attempts to update a Canadian classic - the realist account of statutory interpretation published by John Willis in the Canadian Bar Review in 1938. Willis' insights are compelling and they remain relevant today. However, by focusing on the rhetoric of statutory interpretation, by far its weakest point, Willis disregards the considerable work that goes on when statutory interpretation is well done. This article draws attention to that work. Part 2 looks at the kinds of analyses relied on by good interpreters to establish that elusive goal, the intention of the legislature. These include textual, purposive, scheme, policy and consequential analysis. Part 2 examines the difference between easy and hard cases, then focuses on the techniques used by interpreters to carry out the different kinds of analyses and how these relate to the formal rules. Part 3 looks at the range of arguments interpreters may construct based on their preliminary analysis. Not every argument in statutory interpretation is about the meaning of words. Interpreters also confront drafter's mistakes, gaps in the legislative scheme, overlap and conflict, and language that is over- or under-inclusive. The structure of these different kinds of arguments is set out and illustrated in Part 3.
Explore
Resource type
Publication year
-
Between 1900 and 1999
(44)
-
Between 1910 and 1919
(1)
- 1918 (1)
- Between 1930 and 1939 (2)
- Between 1950 and 1959 (2)
- Between 1960 and 1969 (6)
- Between 1970 and 1979 (5)
- Between 1980 and 1989 (11)
- Between 1990 and 1999 (17)
-
Between 1910 and 1919
(1)
-
Between 2000 and 2025
(116)
- Between 2000 and 2009 (37)
- Between 2010 and 2019 (41)
- Between 2020 and 2025 (38)