Results | SCC-Authors-Cited

Jaffe, P. G., Bala, N., Scott, K. L., Medhekar, A., & Oliver, C. (2025). Recognizing the Impact of Family Violence on Parents and Children: Translating Legal Reforms into Practice. In Understanding Family Violence in Family Court Proceedings (pp. 1–34). Irwin UTP. https://doi.org/10.3138/9781487567842.001

View on utppublishing.com

Zaccour, S., & Lessard, M. (2025). Le Droit de la famille: avancées et défis depuis la reconnaissance de la violence familiale et du contrôle coercitif. In Contrôle coercitif (pp. 223–242). Presses de l’Université du Québec. https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9782760561250-013/html?lang=en

11 LE DROIT DE LA FAMILLE was published in Contrôle coercitif on page 223.

View on www.degruyterbrill.com

Wiener, C. (2024). Defining coercive control: Problems and possibilities. In M. Burton, V. Bettinson, K. Richardson, & A. Speed (Eds.), Research handbook on domestic violence and abuse. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035300648

Botterell, A. (2020). Trespass to the Person. In E. Chamberlain, S. G. A. Pitel, M. McInnes, J. W. Neyers, Z. Sinel, & G. H. L. Fridman (Eds.), Fridman’s The Law of Torts in Canada. (4th ed., p. 75). Thomson Reuters.

Nolan, D., & Robertson, A. (Eds.). (2012). McBride, Nicholas J. “Rights and the Basis of Tort Law”,. In Rights and private law. Hart Pub.

Birnbaum, R., Bala, N., & Bertrand, L. (2017). The Rise of Self-Representation in Canada’s Family Courts: The Complex Picture Revealed in Surveys of Judges, Lawyers and Litigants. In Marital Rights. Routledge.

This article reports on four interrelated studies on self-representation by family litigants: a study of family litigants in Ontario; a survey of perceptions of lawyers in Ontario and Alberta; and a study of Canadian judges. There has clearly been an increase in self-representation in family cases. Lack of financial resources is the most significant reason for self-representation, but a significant number of the self-represented do not believe that they will have worse outcomes without a lawyer. Lawyers and judges report significant concerns about lack of representation, including fewer settlements and a slower process, with corresponding increased expenses for a represented party.

Newman, W. J. (2016). Constitutional Amendment by Legislation. In E. Macfarlane (Ed.), Constitutional amendment in Canada (pp. 105–125). University of Toronto Press.

Bergevin, A., & Darbouze, E. (2022). La confiscation des produits de la criminalité et des biens infractionnels incluant l’amende compensatoire. In Développements récents en droit criminel (Vol. 517, p. 49). ÉditionsYvon Blais.

Le présent ouvrage rassemble les textes des conférences prononcées lors du colloque intitulé "Développements récents en droit criminel", qui s'est tenu à Montréal, le 6 octobre 2022. -- Quatrième de couverture

Gallant, M. (2014). Civil Processes and Tainted Assets: Exploring Canadian Models of Forfeiture. In C. King & C. Walker (Eds.), Dirty assets: emerging issues in the regulation of criminal and terrorist assets (p. 165). Ashgate Publishing Limited.

Ouellette, M. (1993). Livre premier: Des personnes. In La Réforme du code civil (p. 11). Les Presses de l’Université Laval.

Sabourin, F. (2025). Les demandes intéressant le droit international privé. In D. Ferland & B. Emery (Eds.), Précis de procédure civile du Québec (7e édition., Vol. 2, p. 389). Éditions Yvon Blais.

Vaillancourt, J. S. (2025). Article 109. In L. Chamberland (Ed.), Le grand collectif: Code de procédure civile : commentaires et annotations (10e anniversaire). Éditions Yvon Blais.

Friedland, M. (1994). Reforming Police Powers: Who’s in Charge? In Police Powers in Canada. University of Toronto Press. https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442678583.11

When the Law Reform Commission of Canada was established in 1971,¹ it was thought that, within the then foreseeable future, Canada would have a new Criminal Code covering criminal law and procedure. The minister of justice, John Turner, stated in the House when the bill was under consideration that ‘the Commission should have a complete rewriting of the criminal law as one of its first projects.’² The original commission – and I should declare that I was one of the original commissioners – contemplated a new Code of Criminal Law and Procedure in its first research program, commencing with procedure:

Archibald, B. P. (1982). The Law of Arrest. In V. M. Del Buono (Ed.), Criminal procedure in Canada: studies (p. 125). Butterworths.

Huscroft, G. (2014). Introduction. In B. W. Miller & G. Webber (Eds.), Proportionality and the Rule of Law (pp. 1–18). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107565272.002

Tremblay, L. B. (2009). Le fondement normatif du principe de proportionnalité en théorie constitutionnelle. In G. C. N. Webber (Ed.), The limitation of Charter Rights : critical essays on R. v. Oakes. Éditions Thémis.

Panaccio, C.-M. (2017). The Justification of Rights Violations: Section 1 of the Charter. In The Oxford Handbook of the Canadian Constitution. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780190664817.003.0031

This chapter is about the interpretation of section 1 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Section 1 allows ‘limits’ to constitutional rights insofar as they are reasonable and justified in a free and democratic society. It asks the state for moral justification when a right has been infringed by state action. Moral justification has formal and substantive aspects; therefore the application of section 1 deploys a formal framework of proportionality nestled within a thin conception of liberal democratic political morality. The chapter also addresses the relative moral importance of the notion of ‘rights’, as well as the relevance of institutional considerations. It concludes that the section 1 framework follows a standard model of moral justification and cannot be significantly improved upon.

Hiebert, J. L. (2023). Compromise and the Notwithstanding Clause: Why the Dominant Narrative Distorts Our Understanding. In Contested Constitutionalism: Reflections on the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. (pp. 107–125). University of British Columbia Press. https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.59962/9780774816762-007/html

6 Compromise and the Notwithstanding Clause: Why the Dominant Narrative Distorts Our Understanding was published in Contested Constitutionalism on page 107.

View on www.degruyterbrill.com

National Symposium on Equality Rights Toronto), Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, & Gibson, D. (1986). Accentuating the Positive and Eliminating the Negative: Remedies for Inequality under the Canadian Charter. In L. Smith (Ed.), Righting the balance: Canada’s new equality rights (p. 311). Canadian Human Rights Reporter.

Evans, P. M., & Wekerle, G. R. (2016). The Shifting Terrain of Women’s Welfare: Theory, Discourse, and Activism. In Women and the Canadian Welfare State (pp. 3–27). University of Toronto Press. https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442683549-004

Your search

Results 271 resources

Explore

Resource type

Publication year