Results | SCC-Authors-Cited

Manderscheid, D. J. (1997). Dedication of Public Highways at Common Law. In Municipal and planning law reports, 2nd. (Vol. 37, p. 215). Carswell.

Kierans, P. E., & Borenstein, R. (2003). Injunctions — Interlocutory and Permanent. In R. E. Dimock (Ed.), Intellectual property disputes: resolutions and remedies (Vol. 2, pp. 15–1). Thomson Reuters Canada Limited.

Intellectual property disputes: resolutions and remedies is designed to fill the void linking the advances in intellectual property law with the law of remedies in Canada by providing a comprehensive and integrated resource for understanding intellectual property law and remedies

Butler, D. (1993). Implications of the New Telecommunications Act. In Profiting from Canada’s Telecommunications Act. Insight Press.

Katz, A. (2009). Commentary: Is Collective Administration of Copyrights Justified by the Economic Literature? In M. Boyer, M. J. Trebilcock, & D. Vaver (Eds.), Competition Policy and Intellectual Property (p. 449). Irwin Law.

Craig, C. (2010). Locking Out Lawful Users: Fair Dealing and Anti‑Circumvention in Bill C‑32. In M. Geist (Ed.), From “radical extremism” to “balanced copyright”: Canadian copyright and the digital agenda (p. 117). Irwin Law.

Copyright has long been viewed as one of the government?s most difficult policy issues. It attracts passionate views from a wide range of stakeholders, including creators, consumers, businesses, and educators and it is the source of significant political pressure from the United States. The latest chapter in the Canadian copyright saga unfolded in June 2010 as Industry Minister Tony Clement and Canadian Heritage James Moore tabled Bill C-32, copyright reform legislation billed as providing both balance and a much-needed modernization of the law. The introduction marked the culmination of months of public discussion and internal government debate. This book represents an effort by some of Canada?s leading copyright experts to shift away from the sloganeering that has marked the debate to date by moving toward an informed analysis of Bill C-32 and the future development of Canadian copyright law. Edited by Professor Michael Geist, an internationally regarded authority on Internet and technology law, it responds to the need for non-partisan, informed analysis of Bill C-32. An exceptional group of Canadian scholars from coast-to-coast have come together to assess Canada?s plans for copyright reform and the digital agenda in this timely volume that features context for the reforms, analysis of its impact on technology, business, education, and creators, as well as a look ahead to future copyright and digital issues.

Drassinower, A. (2005). Taking User Rights Seriously. In M. A. Geist (Ed.), In the public interest: the future of Canadian copyright law (p. 462). Irwin Law.

Daly, P. (2019). Introduction. In Apex Courts and the Common Law. University of Toronto Press.

The overarching theme of this collection is the influence of apex courts on the development of the common law¹ – in particular, how the institutional position of apex courts causes them to shape the common law and, conversely, how the traditions of the common law shape the way in which apex courts conceive of their role. Contributors from around the common law world address the overarching theme in three different contexts: first, the particular characteristics of the apex courts of several selected jurisdictions; second, the influence, if any, of constitutionalism and bills of rights on apex courts’ relationships to the

Landau, B., & Shipley, A. Q. (1986). Custody Law Reform in Ontario: The Children’s Law Reform Act. In Children’s rights in the practice of family law (p. 153). Carswell. https://archive.org/details/childrensrightsi0000unse

View on archive.org

Morley, J. (2023). International child abduction and non-Hague Convention countries. In M. Freeman & N. Taylor (Eds.), Research handbook on international child abduction: the 1980 hague convention. Edward Elgar Publishing.

"With a focus on the 1980 Hague Convention, this cutting-edge Research Handbook provides a holistic overview of the law on international child abduction from prevention, through voluntary agreements and Convention proceedings, to post-return and aftercare issues. Analysing the repercussions of abduction from the perspectives of both abducted children and the therapeutic professionals engaged in their cases, chapters assess the contributions of the many professionals and key agencies involved in the field. Identifying the 1980 Hague Convention as the principal global instrument for dealing with child abduction, the Research Handbook traces its role, history, development and impact, alongside the mechanisms required for its effective use. Evaluating current trends, areas of concern in legal practice and various regional initiatives, it considers alternatives to high-conflict court proceedings in international child abduction cases. The Convention's strengths, successes, weaknesses and gaps are discussed, and the Research Handbook concludes by addressing the need to tackle the challenges in its future operation. Interdisciplinary and accessible in approach, the contributions from renowned subject specialists will prove useful to students and scholars of human rights and family law, international law and the intersections between law and gender studies, politics and sociology. Its combination of research, policy and practice will be of use to legal practitioners working in family law alongside NGOs and central authorities working in the field"--

Destrempe Rochette, G. (2025). Surveiller et… réadapter? — La notion de responsabilité chez les adolescents à l’aune de la jurisprudence récente concernant la détermination de la peine. In Développements récents en droit criminel, volume 573 (p. 37). Éditions Yvon Blais.

Le 573e recueil de textes dans la série des colloques du Service de la qualité de la profession du Barreau du Québec regroupe les conférences prononcées le 27 mars 2025, à Montréal, dans le cadre du colloque Les développements récents en droit criminel. Nous sommes particulièrement heureux d’avoir pu compter sur l’expertise et la généreuse collaboration de Me Léon Moubayed du cabinet Davies Ward Phillips et Vineberg, S.E.N.C.R.L., s.r.l. et de MeJulie Auclair du Barreau du Québec. Nous devons à MeMoubayed et MeAuclair d’avoir su réunir une équipe de spécialistes chevronnés autour de sujets pertinents. Les conférenciers retenus en raison de leur expertise et de leurs connaissances, n’ont pas hésité à consacrer nombre d’heures au bénéfice de la communauté juridique.

Your search

Results 30 resources

Explore

Resource type

Publication year