Results | SCC-Authors-Cited

Dionne, P. (2005). La reconnaissance et la définition contemporaines des droits ancestraux: négocier ou s’adresser au juge? In G. Otis (Ed.), Droit, Territoire et Gouvernance des Peuples Autochtones. (1st ed., p. 71). Les Presses de l’Université Laval. https://doi.org/10.1515/9782763750330

McNeil, K. (2004). Continuity of Aboriginal Rights. In K. Wilkins & University of Alberta Centre for Constitutional Studies (Eds.), Advancing Aboriginal claims: visions, strategies, directions (p. 127). Purich Pub.

Romanow, R. (1985). Aboriginal Rights in the Constitutional Process. In M. Boldt, J. A. Long, & L. Little Bear (Eds.), Quest for justice: aboriginal peoples and aboriginal rights (p. 73). University of Toronto Press.

Lawrence, S. (2017). Equality and Anti-discrimination: The Relationship between Government Goals and Finding Discrimination in Section 15. In P. Oliver, P. Macklem, & N. Des Rosiers (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Canadian Constitution (p. 0). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780190664817.003.0039

This chapter considers the effect of section 1, the “justification” section of the Canadian Charter, on the doctrinal development of section 15, the equality section. It begins by describing the development of the section 15 substantive equality analysis, including the claim of a conceptually complete separation from the section 1 analysis of state justification. The chapter then identifies some features of section 15 which suggest that this separation is less than complete, including the existence of section 15(2), and anxieties over constraining government action. The chapter then turns to three post-2001 cases in which the Supreme Court of Canada found discrimination under the Charter but then held that discrimination was “justified” through section 1, and asks what these cases might reveal about the symbolic significance of a finding of discrimination and the Court’s struggle with institutional competence concerns in equality claims.

View on doi.org

Jackson, V. C. (2017). Proportionality and Equality. In V. C. Jackson & M. Tushnet (Eds.), Proportionality: New Frontiers, New Challenges. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316691724.009

Maillette, H. (2019). Incidents qui mettent fin à l’instance. In P.-C. Lafond (Ed.), JurisClasseur Québec. Procédure civile. I. (2e ed.). LexisNexis. (Original work published 2015)

Lafond, P. (2018). Introduction. In P.-C. Lafond & M.-C. Belleau (Eds.), Régler autrement les différends (Deuxième édition.). LexisNexis Canada Inc.

Fricero, N. (2019). Audience et débats. In P. Carillon & R. Perrot (Eds.), *JurisClasseur France — Procédure civile*. LexisNexis.

Encyclopédie juridique de droit français. Donne l'état des diverses branches du droit en France: doctrine, jurisprudence, index bibliographique, certains périodiques en texte intégral (exhaustivité variable)

Fricero, N. (2018). Désistement. In P. Carillon & R. Perrot (Eds.), *JurisClasseur France — Procédure civile*. LexisNexis.

Encyclopédie juridique de droit français. Donne l'état des diverses branches du droit en France: doctrine, jurisprudence, index bibliographique, certains périodiques en texte intégral (exhaustivité variable)

Guillemard, S. (2016). Réflexions autour des sept premiers articles du *Code de procédure civile*. In S. Guillemard (Ed.), Le Code de procédure civile: quelles nouveautés? (p. 123). Éditions Yvon Blais.

Piché‑Messier, M., & McNicoll, A. B. (2019). Développements récents en matière de propriété intellectuelle dans le cadre des ordonnances de type *Anton Piller*, *Mareva* et *Norwich*. In Développements récents en droit de la propriété intellectuelle (Vol. 464, p. 89). Éditions Yvon Blais.

Plamondon, J. (2016). Les principes directeurs et le nouveau Code de procédure civile (art. 17 à 24 C.p.c.). In S. Guillemard (Ed.), Le Code de procédure civile: quelles nouveautés? (p. 27). Éditions Yvon Blais.

Côté, P.-A., & LeBel, L. (2011). La méthode d’interprétation moderne: le juge devant lui‑même et en lui‑même. In M. Devinat & S. Beaulac (Eds.), Interpretatio non cessat: mélanges en l’honneur de Pierre-André Côté = essays in honour of Pierre-André Côté (p. 103). Éditions Y. Blais.

Rochette, S., & Côté, J.-F. (2020). Article 12. In L. Chamberland & Québec (Province) (Eds.), Le grand collectif: Code de procédure civile : commentaires et annotations (5e ed., Vol. 1). Éditions Yvon Blais.

Matheson, D. (2009). Dignity and Selective Self‑Presentation. In I. Kerr, V. M. Steeves, & C. Lucock (Eds.), Lessons from the identity trail: anonymity, privacy and identity in a networked society (p. 319). Oxford University Press.

"During the past decade, rapid developments in information and communications technology have transformed key social, commercial, and political realities. Within that same time period, working at something less than Internet speed, much of the academic and policy debate arising from these new and emerging technologies has been fragmented. There have been few examples of interdisciplinary dialogue about the importance and impact of anonymity and privacy in a networked society. Lessons from the Identity Trail: Anonymity, Privacy and Identity in a Networked Society fills that gap, and examines key questions about anonymity, privacy, and identity in an environment that increasingly automates the collection of personal information and relies upon surveillance to promote private and public sector goals." "This book has been informed by the results of a multi-million dollar research project that has brought together a distinguished array of philosophers, ethicists, feminists, cognitive scientists, lawyers, cryptographers, engineers, policy analysts, government policy makers, and privacy experts. Working collaboratively over a four-year period and participating in an iterative process designed to maximize the potential for interdisciplinary discussion and feedback through a series of workshops and peer review, the authors have integrated crucial public policy themes with the most recent research outcomes."--BOOK JACKET.

Lederman, W. R. (1991). Charter influences on future constitutional reform. In After Meech Lake - lessons for the future (pp. 115–120).

MacDonnell, V., Daly, P., & Albert, R. (2019). Section 96: Striking a Balance between Legal Centralism and Legal Pluralism. In The Canadian Constitution in Transition (pp. 84–102). University of Toronto Press. https://doi.org/10.3138/9781487519117-004

Huguette St-Louis. (2007). Reform of the Trial Courts in Quebec. In Canada’s Trial Courts. University of Toronto Press. https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442684119.9

I am one of those who believe that the courts are not static institutions. On the contrary, they must adapt to the expectations of the system’s users. In an article published in 2000 in theCanadian Bar Review, Judge Gerald Seniuk and Professor Noel Lyon showed that the development of the Provincial Courts raises many problems, not the least of them being the tendency of the system to evolve in a way that no longer fits the constitutional framework.¹ In this context, and in light of concrete examples and the reflections of experts, we must be particularly attentive to this

Bray, S. L. (2019). Fiduciary Remedies. In The Oxford Handbook of Fiduciary Law. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190634100.013.25

This chapter offers an overview and analysis of fiduciary remedies. The remedies considered are accounting for profits, constructive trust, equitable compensation, injunction, the unwinding remedies (e.g., rescission), and the supervisory remedies (e.g., instruction, removal). One point of emphasis is the close relationship between fiduciary duties and fiduciary remedies. The chapter also distinguishes the remedies of fiduciary law from those of agency. In addition, the chapter considers three major unsettled questions. First, are the remedial aims of fiduciary law distinct from tort and contract? Second, how should judges and scholars think about fiduciary remedies in light of the distinction between law and equity? Third, is punishment of an erring fiduciary a legitimate aim for fiduciary remedies?

Simard, R. P. (2011). Priorités et droits spéciaux de la couronne. In JurisClasseur Québec. Sûretés. (Vol. 1). LexisNexis.

Your search

Results 224 resources

Explore

Resource type

Publication year