Your search
Results 680 resources
-
Disclaimer: This summary was generated by AI based on the content of the source document.
-
Disclaimer: This summary was generated by AI based on the content of the source document.
-
"Account of Profits is a powerful weapon in the litigator's arsenal. Written by Peter Devonshire, a leading scholar on the subject, it is an important but underutilised remedy that can be granted in cases where defendants have profited from their wrongs. An account of profits is the principal remedy for breach of fiduciary duty and breach of obligations of confidence. The remedy is also available in respect of certain common law wrongs and has an important role in cases of intellectual property infringement. The book draws primarily from English and Australian case law as well as judgments of the New Zealand courts. It also includes the decisions of other Commonwealth jurisdictions and the views of leading academic commentators. The author provides a clear and comprehensive explanation of the legal principles regarding an account of profits. The remedy is assessed in context, enabling the reader to identify the key issues and apply the relevant concepts. The Hon Michael Kirby describes Account of Profits as "original, timely, practical and forward-looking" and "a book of great practical worth for lawyers in many countries where the common law and the law of equity still flourish". This is a leading text on this important and expanding area of law, Account of Profits is a valuable resource for students, practitioners, academics and judges"--Publisher
-
A fundamental principle in nearly every common-law jurisdiction, such as the United Kingdom, Australia, New Zealand, Canada, and the United States, is that an offender's prior record should play a central role in sentencing. In fact, the importance of previous criminal history should only be surpassed by the seriousness of offence committed (Roberts, 1997; Ulmer, 1997; Vigorita, 2001). In Canada, the public has held the views that repeat offenders should be held more accountable for their offenses and should receive a harsher penalty (Roberts, 2008). This perspective is based on the notion that deliberate and persistent criminal activity indicates that the offender is a chronic and significant risk to society who consistently demonstrates a disregard for the rules and laws of society and its citizens.
-
This article reflects on both the current operation and potential future application of the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction. In particular, it explores the significance of the ‘grave risk’ exception contained in Article 13(1)(b) for cases of alleged domestic violence. The deliberations of an international working group (of which the author is a member) tasked with developing a Guide to Good Practice on the interpretation and application of Article 13(1)(b) highlight some of the profound difficulties in finding a way forward on this important issue.
Explore
Resource type
- Blog Post (1)
- Book (250)
- Book Section (101)
- Case (6)
- Conference Paper (2)
- Dictionary Entry (18)
- Encyclopedia Article (1)
- Journal Article (291)
- Newspaper Article (1)
- Preprint (2)
- Report (6)
- Web Page (1)
Topics
- Administrative law (2)
- Canada (2)
- Constitutional law (1)
- Copyright (5)
- Copyright Pentalogy (5)
- Intellectual property (5)
- Judicial review (2)
- Securities (1)