Your search
Results 64 resources
-
This paper traces the history of the "legal family" in Canada, the development of the laws governing marriage and the recognition of other familial relationships, and discusses some of the challenges presently facing lawmakers, both legislators and judges, in this area. One theme of this paper is that marriage and the family are not static institutions, but rather their social and legal significance have changed over the course of history in response to changing beliefs, values, behaviors, social structures, technology and demographics. Another theme is that the broad movement towards formal gender equality has had a profound effect on the legal treatment of marriage and the family. However, in most contemporary marriages there is still a differentiation of gender roles, and women continue to be vulnerable in the event of separation. Familial relationships based on marriage and biological ties are still very significant in Canada, but there is more social and legal recognition of a range of non-traditional familial relationships than in most other countries, including non-marital opposite-sex cohabitation, same-sex marriage, social parentage and more recently multiple parentage arising from the use of artificial reproductive technology. Despite the recognition of a more diverse range of family forms, and the adoption of a functional and flexible approach to the definition of legally significant familial relationships, monogamous conjugality is likely to remain a central concept of Canadian law, and Canada seems unlikely to extend legal recognition to polygamy.
-
"The law of torts is concerned with the secondary obligations generated by the infringement of primary rights. This work seeks to show that this apparently simple proposition enables us to understand the law of torts as found in the common Jaw." "Using primarily English materials, but drawing heavily upon the law of other common law jurisdictions, Stevens seeks to give an account of the law of torts which relies upon the core material familiar to most students and practitioners with a grasp of the law of torts. This material is drawn together in support of a single argument in a provocative and accessible style, and puts forward a new theoretical model for analysing the law of torts, providing an overarching framework for radically reconceiving the subject."--BOOK JACKET.
-
"Despite its great achievements, the domestic violence revolution is stalled, Evan Stark argues, a provocative conclusion he documents by showing that interventions have failed to improve women's long-term safety in relationships or to hold perpetrators accountable. Stark traces this failure to a startling paradox, that the singular focus on violence against women masks an even more devastating reality. In millions of abusive relationships, men use a largely unidentified form of subjugation that more closely resembles kidnapping or indentured servitude than assault. He calls this pattern "coercive control." Drawing on sources that range from FBI statistics and film to dozens of actual cases from his thirty years of experience as an award-winning researcher, advocate, and forensic expert, Stark shows in terrifying detail how men can use coercive control to extend their dominance over time and through social space in ways that subvert women's autonomy, isolate them, and infiltrate the most intimate corners of their lives. Against this backdrop, Stark analyzes the cases of three women tried for crimes committed in the context of abuse, showing that their reactions are only intelligible when they are reframed as victims of coercive control rather than as "battered wives."" "Elevating coercive control from a second-class misdemeanor to a human rights violation, Stark explains why law, policy, and advocacy must shift their focus to emphasize how coercive control jeopardizes women's freedom in everyday life. Fiercely argued and eminently readable, Stark's work is certain to breathe new life into the domestic violence revolution."--BOOK JACKET.
-
Disclaimer: This summary was generated by AI based on the content of the source document.
-
Disclaimer: This summary was generated by AI based on the content of the source document.
-
Disclaimer: This summary was generated by AI based on the content of the source document.
-
Disclaimer: This summary was generated by AI based on the content of the source document.
-
Disclaimer: This summary was generated by AI based on the content of the source document.
-
I am one of those who believe that the courts are not static institutions. On the contrary, they must adapt to the expectations of the system’s users. In an article published in 2000 in theCanadian Bar Review, Judge Gerald Seniuk and Professor Noel Lyon showed that the development of the Provincial Courts raises many problems, not the least of them being the tendency of the system to evolve in a way that no longer fits the constitutional framework.¹ In this context, and in light of concrete examples and the reflections of experts, we must be particularly attentive to this
Explore
Resource type
- Book (21)
- Book Section (6)
- Dictionary Entry (6)
- Journal Article (30)
- Preprint (1)