Tethering the Fraud Inquiry in Letter of Credit Law
Resource type
Author/contributor
- Dolan, John F. (Author)
Title
Tethering the Fraud Inquiry in Letter of Credit Law
Abstract
The law of abstract payment undertakings fashions a rule that the undertakings are, as their name implies, independent of the transactions out of which they arise. That independence principle admits of an important exception if the beneficiary of the undertaking fraudulently seeks payment when he has no colourable right to payment. The parameters of the fraud exception to the abstraction principle are of necessity imprecise. Although courts have developed a number of limits to the exception, some courts, unaware perhaps of the danger they pose to the commercial efficacy of these undertakings, sometimes engage in wide-ranging fraud inquiry. This article contends that courts must limit the inquiry. The article illustrates the problem with analysis of three cases, one each from Australia, Canada and the United States. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
Publication
Banking & Finance Law Review
Publisher
HAB Press Limited
Date
Jun 2006
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
479-503
Accessed
12/26/25, 3:43 AM
ISSN
08328722
Language
English
Library Catalog
ProQuest
License
Copyright Carswell Publishing Jun 2006
Extra
Num Pages: 25
Place: Toronto, Canada
Citation
Dolan, J. F. (2006). Tethering the Fraud Inquiry in Letter of Credit Law. Banking & Finance Law Review, 21(3), 479–503. https://www.proquest.com/docview/218862832/abstract/F4F0A9E2D3CE4DFBPQ/1
Link to this record
Relations