The Unfinished Project of Roncarelli v. Duplessis: Justiciability, Discretion, and the Limits of the Rule of Law
Resource type
Author/contributor
- Sossin, Lorne (Author)
Title
The Unfinished Project of Roncarelli v. Duplessis: Justiciability, Discretion, and the Limits of the Rule of Law
Abstract
Roncarelli is remembered fifty years later particularly because of Justice Rand’s now iconic statement that “there is no such thing as absolute and untrammelled discretion.” Justice Rand defined “untrammelled discretion” as circumstances where action can be taken on any ground or for any reason that can be suggested to the mind of the decision maker. This statement has been understood to mean that all public regulation exercised through discretionary decision-making by executive officials has legal boundaries, and that the role of the courts is to ensure that decisions do not exceed those boundaries.
Publication
McGill Law Journal
Publisher
McGill Law Journal / Revue de droit de McGill
Date
2010
Volume
55
Issue
3
Pages
661-688
Journal Abbr
mlj
Accessed
3/24/26, 10:14 PM
ISSN
0024-9041, 1920-6356
Short Title
The Unfinished Project of Roncarelli v. Duplessis
Language
en
Library Catalog
www-erudit-org.ledproxy2.uwindsor.ca
Citation
Sossin, L. (2010). The Unfinished Project of Roncarelli v. Duplessis: Justiciability, Discretion, and the Limits of the Rule of Law. McGill Law Journal, 55(3), 661–688. https://doi.org/10.7202/1000628ar
Link to this record