Results | SCC-Authors-Cited

Gunn, B. L. (2019). Bringing a Gendered Lens to Implementing the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. In J. Borrows (Ed.), Braiding legal orders: implementing the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (p. 55). Centre for International Governance Innovation. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.11955033

"Implementation in Canada of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) is a pivotal opportunity to explore the relationship between international law, Indigenous peoples' own laws and Canada's constitutional narratives. Two significant statements by the current Liberal government (the May 2016 address by Indigenous Affairs Minister Carolyn Bennett to the Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues at the United Nations and the September 2017 address to the United Nations by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau) have endorsed UNDRIP and committed Canada to implementing it as 'a way forward' on the path to genuine nation-to-nation relationships with Indigenous peoples. In response, these essays engage with the legal, historical, political and practical aspects of UNDRIP implementation. Written by Indigenous legal scholars and policy leaders, and guided by the metaphor of braiding international, domestic and Indigenous laws into a strong, unified whole composed of distinct parts, the book makes visible the possibilities for reconciliation from different angles and under different lenses"-- Provided by the publisher.

Pelletier, R., & Nerland, K. (2019). Indian status and the crisis of missing and murdered women. In T. Isaac (Ed.), Key developments in Aboriginal law (2019 edition., p. 13). Thomson Reuters.

"The objective of this book is to provide commentary from leading practitioners and thought-leaders on timely and important issues in the area of Aboriginal law in Canada"--Preface, page iii.

McLachlin, B. (2019). The Role of the Supreme Court of Canada in Shaping the Common Law. In Apex Courts and the Common Law (pp. 25–35). University of Toronto Press. https://doi.org/10.3138/9781487504434.003

View on utppublishing.com

Maillette, H. (2019). Incidents qui mettent fin à l’instance. In P.-C. Lafond (Ed.), JurisClasseur Québec. Procédure civile. I. (2e ed.). LexisNexis. (Original work published 2015)

Fricero, N. (2019). Audience et débats. In P. Carillon & R. Perrot (Eds.), *JurisClasseur France — Procédure civile*. LexisNexis.

Encyclopédie juridique de droit français. Donne l'état des diverses branches du droit en France: doctrine, jurisprudence, index bibliographique, certains périodiques en texte intégral (exhaustivité variable)

Piché‑Messier, M., & McNicoll, A. B. (2019). Développements récents en matière de propriété intellectuelle dans le cadre des ordonnances de type *Anton Piller*, *Mareva* et *Norwich*. In Développements récents en droit de la propriété intellectuelle (Vol. 464, p. 89). Éditions Yvon Blais.

MacDonnell, V., Daly, P., & Albert, R. (2019). Section 96: Striking a Balance between Legal Centralism and Legal Pluralism. In The Canadian Constitution in Transition (pp. 84–102). University of Toronto Press. https://doi.org/10.3138/9781487519117-004

Bray, S. L. (2019). Fiduciary Remedies. In The Oxford Handbook of Fiduciary Law. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190634100.013.25

This chapter offers an overview and analysis of fiduciary remedies. The remedies considered are accounting for profits, constructive trust, equitable compensation, injunction, the unwinding remedies (e.g., rescission), and the supervisory remedies (e.g., instruction, removal). One point of emphasis is the close relationship between fiduciary duties and fiduciary remedies. The chapter also distinguishes the remedies of fiduciary law from those of agency. In addition, the chapter considers three major unsettled questions. First, are the remedial aims of fiduciary law distinct from tort and contract? Second, how should judges and scholars think about fiduciary remedies in light of the distinction between law and equity? Third, is punishment of an erring fiduciary a legitimate aim for fiduciary remedies?

Hanlon, M. J., Tickle, V., & Csiszar, E. (2019). Conflicting Case Law, Competing Statutes, and the Confounding Priority Battle of the Interim Financing Charge and the Crown’s Deemed Trust for Source Deductions. In J. P. Sarra (Ed.), Annual review of insolvency law. (p. 897). Thomson Carswell.

Newman, D. (2019). Canada’s Notwithstanding Clause, Dialogue, and Constitutional Identities. In G. Sigalet, G. C. N. Webber, & R. Dixon (Eds.), Constitutional Dialogue (pp. 209–234). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108277938.009

Torres‑Ceyte, J., & Lacroix, M. (2019). Impression(s), la dignité. In Chaire Jean-Louis Baudouin en droit civil, B. Lefebvre, & B. Moore (Eds.), Les grandes valeurs (p. 19). Thémis.

Besson, S., & Kleber, E. (2019). Article 2. The Right to Non‑Discrimination”, in John Tobin, ed., *The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child: A Commentary. In J. Tobin (Ed.), The UN Convention on the rights of the child: a commentary (First edition., p. 41). University Press.

Comprehensive article-by-article analysis of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. Addresses a wide range of related issues including key interpretive questions. Contributions from specialist scholars in the field. Select bibliography at the end of each chapter directs readers to useful resources for further enquiry.

Pelletier, Simon, & Côté, F. (2019). Développements récents en matière d’expropriation déguisée: distinction entre les recours en nullité, en dommages pour responsabilité extracontractuelle d’un organisme public et en expropriation déguisée. In Service de la qualité de la profession du Barreau du Québec (Ed.), Développements récents en droit de l’environnement (Vol. 468, p. 303). Éditions Yvon Blais. https://search.worldcat.org/title/1142179160

Développements récents en droit de l'environnement [2019] | WorldCat.org

View on search.worldcat.org

Seaman, Christopher B. (2019). Lost Profits and Disgorgement. In B. Biddle, J. L. Contreras, B. J. Love, & N. Siebrasse (Eds.), Patent remedies and complex products: toward a global consensus (p. 50). Cambridge University Press.

Rason, N. O., & Pennicino, S. (2019). Comparative Law in the Jurisprudence of the Supreme Court of Canada. In Judicial Cosmopolitanism (pp. 140–176). Brill Nijhoff. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004297593_006

"Comparative Law in the Jurisprudence of the Supreme Court of Canada" published on 09 Sep 2019 by Brill | Nijhoff.

View on brill.com

Tobin, J. (2019). Article 4. A State’s General Obligation of Implementation. In J. Tobin (Ed.), The UN Convention on the rights of the child: a commentary (First edition., p. 108). University Press.

Comprehensive article-by-article analysis of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. Addresses a wide range of related issues including key interpretive questions. Contributions from specialist scholars in the field. Select bibliography at the end of each chapter directs readers to useful resources for further enquiry.

Moses, James Roderick. (2019). Student Loans — How the Bankruptcy Provisions Could Benefit from Additional Parliamentary Review. In J. P. Sarra (Ed.), Annual review of insolvency law. Thomson Reuteurs Canada.

"Annual Review of Insolvency Law is a collection of cutting-edge articles by practitioners, academics and members of the judiciary from all regions of Canada, written to provide professionals with a state-of-the-art overview of the most vital and relevant developments in Canadian insolvency law."-- Publisher's website

Daly, P. (2019). Introduction. In Apex Courts and the Common Law. University of Toronto Press.

The overarching theme of this collection is the influence of apex courts on the development of the common law¹ – in particular, how the institutional position of apex courts causes them to shape the common law and, conversely, how the traditions of the common law shape the way in which apex courts conceive of their role. Contributors from around the common law world address the overarching theme in three different contexts: first, the particular characteristics of the apex courts of several selected jurisdictions; second, the influence, if any, of constitutionalism and bills of rights on apex courts’ relationships to the

Your search

Results 18 resources

Explore

Resource type

Publication year