Results | SCC-Authors-Cited

Fudge, J. (2013). Freedom of Association. In G. A. Beaudoin, E. Mendes, & S. Beaulac (Eds.), Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (5th ed., p. 527). LexisNexis Butterworths.

Cameron, J., & Des Rosiers, N. (2017). The Right to Protest, Freedom of Expression, and Freedom of Association. In P. Oliver, P. Macklem, & N. Des Rosiers (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Canadian Constitution (p. 0). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780190664817.003.0035

Freedom of expression and freedom of association are guaranteed by section 2 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. These freedoms are closely related, conceptually and philosophically, but evolved in different directions under the Charter. Whereas section 2(b)’s guarantee of expressive freedom generated a rich jurisprudence across diverse issues, section 2(d)’s attention focused on associational freedom in the context of labour union activities. The authors draw on a pocket of section 2(b) case law on picketing and other labour-related expressive activities to bring these guarantees into comparison. In doing so, they comment on the Supreme Court of Canada’s interpretation of each guarantee, including the constitutionalization of key aspects of labour relations under section 2(d). In addition, the authors critique the Court’s jurisprudence, emphasizing the central importance of protecting protest and dissent activities under both guarantees.

View on doi.org

Barrett, S., & Poskanzer, E. (2012). What Fraser Means For Labour Rights in Canada. In J. Fudge, E. Tucker, & F. Faraday (Eds.), Constitutional labour rights in Canada: farm workers and the Fraser case (p. 190). Irwin Law.

Gibson, M. (2016). Military Justice in Operational Settings, Peacekeeping Missions and Situations of Transitional Justice. In A. Duxbury & M. Groves (Eds.), Military Justice in the Modern Age, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (p. 381). Cambridge University Press.

Gruben, V. (2013). Le bilinguisme judiciaire. In M. Bastarache, M. Doucet, & L. Arbour (Eds.), Les droits linguistiques au Canada (Troisième édition., p. 301). Éditions Yvon Blais.

Rosenfeld, M. (2012). Constitutional Identity. In M. Rosenfeld & A. Sajó (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law (p. 0). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199578610.013.0037

View on doi.org

Jai, J. (2017). Bargains Made in Bad Times: In The Right Relationship (pp. 105–148). University of Toronto Press. https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442630215.006

View on utppublishing.com

Wood, R. J. (2016). Transfers at Undervalue: New Wine in Old Wineskins. In J. P. Sarra & B. Romaine (Eds.), Annual review of insolvency law 2017. Thomson Reuters.

Payne, Jennifer. (2017). Corporate Attribution and the Lessons of Meridian. In P. S. Davies & J. Pila (Eds.), JURISPRUDENCE OF LORD HOFFMANN: A Festschrift in Honour of Lord Leonard (p. 357). Hart Publishing.

Gagnon-Rocque, A., & Héroux, J. (2014). Arrestation, comparution et mise en liberté. In M.-P. Robert, S. Roy, É. Vanchestein, J. Desrosiers, & F. Lafontaine (Eds.), Preuve et procédure pénales. LexisNexis.

Roberts, J. V. (2011). Proof of Aggravating and Mitigating Facts at Sentencing. In Mitigation and Aggravation at Sentencing. Cambridge University Press.

Tobin, J. (2019). Article 4. A State’s General Obligation of Implementation. In J. Tobin (Ed.), The UN Convention on the rights of the child: a commentary (First edition., p. 108). University Press.

Comprehensive article-by-article analysis of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. Addresses a wide range of related issues including key interpretive questions. Contributions from specialist scholars in the field. Select bibliography at the end of each chapter directs readers to useful resources for further enquiry.

Thibault, Pierre. (2013). Les droits démocratiques (articles 3 à 5). In G. A. Beaudoin, E. Mendes, & S. Beaulac (Eds.), Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (5th ed.). LexisNexis Butterworths.

Dawood, Yasmin. (2018). Equal Participation and Campaign Finance: Comparative Perspectives. In T. K. Kuhner & E. D. Mazo (Eds.), Democracy by the people: reforming campaign finance in America. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316822906

Introduces citizens to solutions for reforming the American campaign finance system

View on doi.org

Deslauriers, Jacques. (2016). L’exécution des jugements selon le nouveau Code de procédure civile. In S. Guillemard (Ed.), Le Code de procédure civile: quelles nouveautés? (p. 159). Éditions Yvon Blais.

Moses, James Roderick. (2019). Student Loans — How the Bankruptcy Provisions Could Benefit from Additional Parliamentary Review. In J. P. Sarra (Ed.), Annual review of insolvency law. Thomson Reuteurs Canada.

"Annual Review of Insolvency Law is a collection of cutting-edge articles by practitioners, academics and members of the judiciary from all regions of Canada, written to provide professionals with a state-of-the-art overview of the most vital and relevant developments in Canadian insolvency law."-- Publisher's website

Sarra, J. (Ed.). (2014). Student Loans and Bankruptcy: Five Years Later. In Annual review of insolvency law. Thomson Carswell.

Clermont, Benoît. (2015). Les compilations et la Loi sur le droit d’auteur : leur protection et leur création. In Canadian patent reporter (Vol. 18). Canada Law Book.

Craig, C. (2010). Locking Out Lawful Users: Fair Dealing and Anti‑Circumvention in Bill C‑32. In M. Geist (Ed.), From “radical extremism” to “balanced copyright”: Canadian copyright and the digital agenda (p. 117). Irwin Law.

Copyright has long been viewed as one of the government?s most difficult policy issues. It attracts passionate views from a wide range of stakeholders, including creators, consumers, businesses, and educators and it is the source of significant political pressure from the United States. The latest chapter in the Canadian copyright saga unfolded in June 2010 as Industry Minister Tony Clement and Canadian Heritage James Moore tabled Bill C-32, copyright reform legislation billed as providing both balance and a much-needed modernization of the law. The introduction marked the culmination of months of public discussion and internal government debate. This book represents an effort by some of Canada?s leading copyright experts to shift away from the sloganeering that has marked the debate to date by moving toward an informed analysis of Bill C-32 and the future development of Canadian copyright law. Edited by Professor Michael Geist, an internationally regarded authority on Internet and technology law, it responds to the need for non-partisan, informed analysis of Bill C-32. An exceptional group of Canadian scholars from coast-to-coast have come together to assess Canada?s plans for copyright reform and the digital agenda in this timely volume that features context for the reforms, analysis of its impact on technology, business, education, and creators, as well as a look ahead to future copyright and digital issues.

Daly, P. (2019). Introduction. In Apex Courts and the Common Law. University of Toronto Press.

The overarching theme of this collection is the influence of apex courts on the development of the common law¹ – in particular, how the institutional position of apex courts causes them to shape the common law and, conversely, how the traditions of the common law shape the way in which apex courts conceive of their role. Contributors from around the common law world address the overarching theme in three different contexts: first, the particular characteristics of the apex courts of several selected jurisdictions; second, the influence, if any, of constitutionalism and bills of rights on apex courts’ relationships to the

Your search

Results 20 resources

Explore

Resource type

Publication year