Results | SCC-Authors-Cited

Gagnon-Rocque, A., & Héroux, J. (2014). Arrestation, comparution et mise en liberté. In M.-P. Robert, S. Roy, É. Vanchestein, J. Desrosiers, & F. Lafontaine (Eds.), Preuve et procédure pénales. LexisNexis.

Les procédures précédant le procès en matière criminelle. (2025). In Droit pénal: procédure et preuve (p. 39). École du Barreau.

Roberts, J. V. (2011). Proof of Aggravating and Mitigating Facts at Sentencing. In Mitigation and Aggravation at Sentencing. Cambridge University Press.

Tobin, J. (2019). Article 4. A State’s General Obligation of Implementation. In J. Tobin (Ed.), The UN Convention on the rights of the child: a commentary (First edition., p. 108). University Press.

Comprehensive article-by-article analysis of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. Addresses a wide range of related issues including key interpretive questions. Contributions from specialist scholars in the field. Select bibliography at the end of each chapter directs readers to useful resources for further enquiry.

Joyal, R., & Provost, M. (2000). La Loi sur la protection de la jeunesse de 1977: une maturation laborieuse, un texte porteur. In L’évolution de la protection de l’enfance au Québec (p. 189). Presses de l’Université du Québec.

Thibault, Pierre. (2013). Les droits démocratiques (articles 3 à 5). In G. A. Beaudoin, E. Mendes, & S. Beaulac (Eds.), Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (5th ed.). LexisNexis Butterworths.

Dawood, Yasmin. (2018). Equal Participation and Campaign Finance: Comparative Perspectives. In T. K. Kuhner & E. D. Mazo (Eds.), Democracy by the people: reforming campaign finance in America. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316822906

Introduces citizens to solutions for reforming the American campaign finance system

View on doi.org

Cameron, Jamie. (2024). The Text and the Ballot Box: Section 3, Section 33, and the Right to Cast an Informed Vote. In P. L. Biro (Ed.), The Notwithstanding Clause and the Canadian Charter: Rights, Reforms, and Controversies: Rights, Reforms, and Controversies (p. 381). McGill-Queen’s University Press.

Section 33 - what is commonly referred to as the notwithstanding clause (NWC) - was written into the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms to allow Parliament and the provinces to provisionally override certain Charter rights.The Notwithstanding Clause and the Canadian Charter examines the NWC from all angles and perspectives, considering who should have the last word on matters of rights and justice - the legislatures or the unelected judiciary - and what balance liberal democracy requires. In the case of Quebec, the use of the clause has been justified as necessary to preserve the province's culture and promote its identity as a nation. Yet Quebec's pre-emptive and sweeping invocation of the clause also challenges the scope of judicial review and citizens' recourse to it, and it tests the assumption that a dialogue between the judiciary and the legislature is always preferable in instances in which the legislative branch decides to suspend the operation of certain Charter rights and freedoms. By virtue of its contested purposes, interpretations, operation, and applications, the NWC represents and, to an extent, defines both the character and the very real vulnerabilities of liberal constitutionalism in Canada.The significance, effects, and legitimacy of the NWC have been vigorously debated within scholarship and among politicians and activists since the patriation of the Canadian Constitution in 1982. In The Notwithstanding Clause and the Canadian Charter leading scholars, jurists, and policy experts elucidate and prescribe reforms to the application of this consequential clause about which so much is written, and around which there is relatively little consensus.

Deslauriers, Jacques. (2016). L’exécution des jugements selon le nouveau Code de procédure civile. In S. Guillemard (Ed.), Le Code de procédure civile: quelles nouveautés? (p. 159). Éditions Yvon Blais.

Belleau, Charles. (2025). L’exécution des jugements. In D. Ferland & B. Emery (Eds.), Précis de procédure civile du Québec (7e édition, Vol. 2, p. 1157). Éditions Yvon Blais.

Moses, James Roderick. (2019). Student Loans — How the Bankruptcy Provisions Could Benefit from Additional Parliamentary Review. In J. P. Sarra (Ed.), Annual review of insolvency law. Thomson Reuteurs Canada.

"Annual Review of Insolvency Law is a collection of cutting-edge articles by practitioners, academics and members of the judiciary from all regions of Canada, written to provide professionals with a state-of-the-art overview of the most vital and relevant developments in Canadian insolvency law."-- Publisher's website

Sarra, J. (Ed.). (2014). Student Loans and Bankruptcy: Five Years Later. In Annual review of insolvency law. Thomson Carswell.

Promislow, Janna, & Metallic, N. (2022). Realizing Aboriginal Administrative Law. In C. M. Flood & P. Daly (Eds.), Administrative law in context (Fourth edition., p. 129). Emond.

"Administrative Law in Context, 4th Edition continues this title's approach to administrative law in the important contexts that shape legal ideas and doctrines in this field. It examines key principles and cases by leveraging the distinct voices of leading scholars and instructors from across Canada including an analysis of the recent Vavilov trilogy of cases from the Supreme Court of Canada and their significant affect on how judicial reviews of administrative decisions are now conducted in Canada. This detailed, collaborative analysis gives students a better sense of how administrative boards and tribunals work in practice and differentiates itself from Admin8 by using a contemporary experiential pedagogy that employs increased commentary and discussion."-- Provided by publisher.

Clermont, Benoît. (2015). Les compilations et la Loi sur le droit d’auteur : leur protection et leur création. In Canadian patent reporter (Vol. 18). Canada Law Book.

Carrière, Laurent. (2001). Voies et recours civils en matière de violation de droits d’auteur au Canada. In Développements récents en droit de la propriété intellectuelle: 2001 ; [rassemble les textes des conférences prononcées lors du Colloque Intitulé “Les Récents Développements en Droit de la Propriété Intellectuelle” qui s’est tenu à Montréal, le 18 mai 2001]. Blais.

Kierans, P. E., & Borenstein, R. (2003). Injunctions — Interlocutory and Permanent. In R. E. Dimock (Ed.), Intellectual property disputes: resolutions and remedies (Vol. 2, pp. 15–1). Thomson Reuters Canada Limited.

Intellectual property disputes: resolutions and remedies is designed to fill the void linking the advances in intellectual property law with the law of remedies in Canada by providing a comprehensive and integrated resource for understanding intellectual property law and remedies

Katz, A. (2009). Commentary: Is Collective Administration of Copyrights Justified by the Economic Literature? In M. Boyer, M. J. Trebilcock, & D. Vaver (Eds.), Competition Policy and Intellectual Property (p. 449). Irwin Law.

Craig, C. (2010). Locking Out Lawful Users: Fair Dealing and Anti‑Circumvention in Bill C‑32. In M. Geist (Ed.), From “radical extremism” to “balanced copyright”: Canadian copyright and the digital agenda (p. 117). Irwin Law.

Copyright has long been viewed as one of the government?s most difficult policy issues. It attracts passionate views from a wide range of stakeholders, including creators, consumers, businesses, and educators and it is the source of significant political pressure from the United States. The latest chapter in the Canadian copyright saga unfolded in June 2010 as Industry Minister Tony Clement and Canadian Heritage James Moore tabled Bill C-32, copyright reform legislation billed as providing both balance and a much-needed modernization of the law. The introduction marked the culmination of months of public discussion and internal government debate. This book represents an effort by some of Canada?s leading copyright experts to shift away from the sloganeering that has marked the debate to date by moving toward an informed analysis of Bill C-32 and the future development of Canadian copyright law. Edited by Professor Michael Geist, an internationally regarded authority on Internet and technology law, it responds to the need for non-partisan, informed analysis of Bill C-32. An exceptional group of Canadian scholars from coast-to-coast have come together to assess Canada?s plans for copyright reform and the digital agenda in this timely volume that features context for the reforms, analysis of its impact on technology, business, education, and creators, as well as a look ahead to future copyright and digital issues.

Drassinower, A. (2005). Taking User Rights Seriously. In M. A. Geist (Ed.), In the public interest: the future of Canadian copyright law (p. 462). Irwin Law.

Daly, P. (2019). Introduction. In Apex Courts and the Common Law. University of Toronto Press.

The overarching theme of this collection is the influence of apex courts on the development of the common law¹ – in particular, how the institutional position of apex courts causes them to shape the common law and, conversely, how the traditions of the common law shape the way in which apex courts conceive of their role. Contributors from around the common law world address the overarching theme in three different contexts: first, the particular characteristics of the apex courts of several selected jurisdictions; second, the influence, if any, of constitutionalism and bills of rights on apex courts’ relationships to the

Your search

Results 22 resources

Explore

Resource type

Publication year